This article examines the Philosophy of Harm Reduction and was written by East Kootenay Addiction Services' Executive Director, Dean Nicholson. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services.

With all the talk about the Fentanyl crisis, the term Harm Reduction is often raised as an approach to deal with the problem.  Many people are unclear what Harm Reduction means and this article hopes to provide some clarification.  Harm Reduction refers to an approach to dealing with substance abuse, where the primary focus is to reduce the harms associated with using substances, rather than the focus being on stopping the use of substances.  This doesn’t mean that stopping or reducing use is not a goal, just that it is not the first goal. Often Harm Reduction is associated with programs like needle exchanges or safe-injection sites; programs in which people continue to use substances but are encouraged to do so in safer ways.  These are definitely Harm Reduction approaches but Harm Reduction casts a much wider net.  Too often in the past Harm Reduction approaches were contrasted with Abstinence approaches, with the two approaches being seen as polar opposites and opposed in principle.   From the Abstinence side, Harm Reduction was often characterized as supporting or encouraging substance use.   For some people on the Abstinence side, people on an Opioid Replacement Program like Suboxone or Methadone (which is one of the best ways to support people to get off Fentanyl) could be criticized for still being addicts because they were still using a drug.   In fact, Abstinence is also a Harm Reduction approach, as is responsible social drinking, as are needle exchanges. 

A problem with the debate around Harm Reduction is that historically society’s focus on drug and alcohol use as been on the behavior itself – on the using.  If using is the problem, then not using is the solution.  This is further entrenched by then making using illegal and with the consequence that users become criminals.  A Law and Order approach, or a War on Drugs approach, is the natural outcome.  In Canada, about 70% of all Federal dollars that go towards substance use problems, goes to the law enforcement side, including the RCMP, the courts and correctional services.  Only 30% goes to prevention, education, treatment and research.   Law and Order and Abstinence-only approaches limit the ways we can respond as a society.

Perhaps a good analogy is driving.  We all know that one of the major causes of death in Canada is motor vehicle accidents.   If we took a similar approach to driving deaths as we do to substance use, we would make all driving illegal, ban automobiles and motorbikes, and arrest and charge people caught using motor vehicles or involved in the production or sale of motor vehicles.  Clearly this is not an approach that anyone would support, even though we could all agree we would like to reduce motor vehicle deaths.  So what do we do?  We create a wide range of Harm Reduction programs to try and reduce the likelihood of motor vehicle accidents while allowing people to continue driving.  Programs like seat belt laws, graduated licensing systems for new drivers, standardized traffic rules, maximum speeds, improved car design etc. etc.  We don’t view driving as a criminal matter but as a public health concern and we create policies and programs accordingly.  At the same time, we take a Law and Order approach to certain behaviours associated with risky driving, such as speeding or driving while impaired, but we accept that people are going to drive.  Harm Reduction in the area of substance use is just the same.  If we accept that people are going to use substances (and in any given year over 80% of Canadians 15 or over will use a substance) then it makes more sense to develop programs and approaches that discourage unhealthy use, encourage responsible use, and provide means for people who have more serious problems to reduce negative consequences so that they can hopefully be in a place to make healthier choices.  At the same time, there is a role for a Law and Order approach in areas such as trafficking, unregulated drug production and inappropriate public use.

At East Kootenay Addiction Services, we view substance use, abuse and addiction as both a personal and a public health problem, rather than as a criminal problem.  Our aim is to provide services that reduce the harms that use can cause, whether that is by supporting someone to quit using altogether, to use in a more responsible and less harmful way, or to help them improve other areas of their life that their use may be impacting.  If we consider substance use as a personal and public health issue, then the goals for intervention can change, as can the types of interventions that are used.  This is what Harm Reduction means and research shows that programs coming from this approach are more effective in creating overall healthy change for people using and for communities as a whole.

This is the second of two articles regarding information about treatment -- what it is and what it isn't' and the different formats that describe treatment. The series is written by East Kootenay Addiction Services' Executive Director, Dean Nicholson. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services.

As a new story seems to come out daily about the fentanyl problem and what’s being done to address it, it would be understandable if many people were confused about what services and programs are available to assist people with substance use problems.  This article will outline some of the major components and approaches to substance use treatment and how they relate to the current fentanyl problem. 

Firstly, it must be said that not everyone who is experiencing a problem with substances such as alcohol, marijuana, cocaine or fentanyl is necessarily ‘addicted’ in the strict clinical term.  Substance use falls along a continuum from ‘no-use’ through ‘social use’ through ‘problematic use’, and finally ‘dependent or addicted use’.  The type of services that could help will depend on where a person’s use falls on the continuum and what changes they want to make.

Secondly, substance use problems are no longer viewed as a ‘stand-alone’ issue.  It is generally recognized that most people who struggle with substance use problems also have other concerns, such as depression or anxiety, housing and financial problems, relationship problems etc.  It is not enough to deal with the substance use; to make lasting change people often need support in a number of areas of their lives.

With this being said, what are the different components of substance use treatment?  At East Kootenay Addictions Services (EKASS) we believe that treatment starts as soon as someone contacts us.  Reaching out for help means treatment has begun.    After that there are various services that a person could become involved with depending on their situation.

Withdrawal Management:  Often referred to as ‘detox’ or a ‘dry out center’.  Withdrawal management assists people in the initial physical withdrawal that they may experience as they stop using substances.  This could take place at home with outside support, in a withdrawal management center such as Ponderosa House in Cranbrook, or at a local hospital when other medical complications might be present.  People are usually only in a withdrawal program for 5-10 days, depending on the substance, although some substances may take longer to taper off of.  There is no cost for approved withdrawal management services.

Outpatient Counselling:  Outpatient counselling is often the first type of treatment that people access.  People are seen by a trained substance use counsellor who assists them in identifying the problems they are having, developing goals, implementing strategies and connecting them with other services that may be helpful.  At EKASS we see people at our offices, but can also meet people at other locations if that is easier.  There are no costs for people to access outpatient counselling at provincially funded mental health and substance use offices.

Residential Treatment Programs:  This is what most people think of as ‘treatment’ although in reality it is just one type of service.  Residential Programs can run from 6 weeks up to 3 months or more.  The programs offer group counselling in a secure live-in environment.   In B.C. some programs have been accredited and some have not.  Being accredited means that the program has been thoroughly reviewed by an outside evaluator and that the treatment program, the facilities, the staff and the policies all meet an accepted level.  All residential treatment programs have a cost for the user.  If a residential program is run by an accredited not-for-profit society and has an agreement with the Ministry of Health, then a number of beds will be subsidized as $40.00 per day beds.  People usually access these beds through a referral from an substance use counsellor. For people on Income Assistance the program costs are usually covered.   Non-subsidized beds in not-for-profit programs typically run around $120.00 per day.  People can access these beds without a referral from a substance use counsellor.  Private for-profit residential programs can cost upwards of $15,000 per month.  The philosophy of treatment at residential programs generally falls into one of two approaches:  12 Step Programs and Holistic Programs.  The main difference between these approaches is the emphasis on the 12 Step or Minnesota Model of recovery.  Both types of programs use group counselling as a primary counselling strategy. Aboriginal residential programs will usually include aboriginal healing practices as well.  Helping people find the program that is the best match for them is part of what an substance use counsellor does when working with a client.  Residential programs have waitlists, but these can vary from a few days to a number of months, depending on the program.

Harm Reduction Programming:  In one sense all substance use programming aims to reduce the harms associated with using.  In a more specific sense though, in relation to the fentanyl crisis this can refer to two types of programming:  Opioid Replacement Programs and the Take Home Naloxone Program. 

Opioid Replacement Programs: are programs that help someone get off of opioids like heroin, morphine, fentanyl etc, by replacing them with another opioid, such as Methadone or Suboxone.  The purpose of going on Methadone or Suboxone is to prevent the person from going into withdrawal.  Avoiding the pain and sickness associated with withdrawal from opioids is usually the primary reason people keep using.  By having a regular dose of Methadone or Suboxone a person does not go into withdrawal and does not have to engage in the kinds of behaviours that will allow them to keep using.  People are able to stabilize their lives and begin to work on changing other problem areas.  When they are on the proper dose, people do not experience a ‘high’ from Methadone or Suboxone.  There is a lot of monitoring that goes with the program.  In the early stages people often have to get their medication each morning at a pharmacy.  They will have meetings with the prescribing physician every two to four weeks, and they will be required to provide urine samples to show that they are not misusing other opioids.  Despite some of the restrictions these requirements place on a person, research shows that people on an Opioid Replacement Program are less likely to relapse and go back to using.  This means they are at less risk of overdose than people who try to quit opioids on their own.   Furthermore, when people are maintained on an Opioid Replacement Program they are able to create stability in their lives and began working on other concerns to further improve their well-being.   Although any doctor can prescribe Suboxone after a short on-line course, one of the biggest barriers for people getting on to an Opioid Replacement Program is the lack of prescribing doctors.  At EKASS we operate a weekly Telehealth Clinic in which our clients have access to a prescribing doctor in Kamloops. 

Take Home Naloxone Program:  The Take Home Naloxone Program was developed in large part in response to the fentanyl crisis.  Naloxone or Narcan is a drug that when taken helps to reverse an opioid overdose.  Naloxone has been around for decades and has been used by paramedics and hospital emergency departments.  In B.C. the Take Home Naloxone Program has sought to get Naloxone kits into the hands of people at risk for opioid overdose.  Kits are available at a wide range of locations and eligible people can receive a free kit after taking part in a short training program.  At EKASS we have been dispensing kits for nearly two years, and there are many other locations in the East Kootenay where people can receive free kits.

This article has described some of the common components of addictions treatment in British Columbia.  For more information about services offered through EKASS please visit our website at www.ekass.com or call us at 1-800-489-4344.

This is the first of two articles regarding information about treatment -- what it is and what it isn't' and the different formats that describe treatment. The series is written by East Kootenay Addiction Services' Executive Director, Dean Nicholson. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services. 

Over the past number of months there has been a lot of media focus on the fentanyl crisis in B.C.  Many of the stories have talked about the lack of treatment, or the wait for treatment, often with the subtext that if people could have gotten treatment than the problem would have been solved.  But what exactly is ‘addictions treatment’ and how does it work?

We typically think of ‘treatment’ as some kind of intervention that brings about a ‘cure’ or an end to the problems we’ve been having.  Antibiotics are a good example.  We are sick with an infection, we do a treatment of antibiotics which kills the bacteria, and in a few weeks we are back to our normal health.  Dealing with addiction problems is very different.   Addictions treatment does not provide a ‘cure’, nor does the problem go away.  ‘Treatment Centers’ are programs where individuals typically stay for 2-3 months.  These programs provide structure, opportunity for group and individual counselling and support, education, safety, regular food and social connection.  But despite what certain programs might say, they cannot provide a ‘cure’ to addiction.  Any program that promises to cure someone of their addiction is selling a bill of goods.

Why isn’t there a cure for addiction or substance abuse?  Addiction and substance abuse are basically brain disorders.  People use substances for a variety of reasons, but one of the main reasons is because they like the way substances make them feel, at least in the beginning.  Our brain is designed to turn behaviours that we do repeatedly into habits.   The thinking part of our brain doesn’t have to be involved as much, and a deeper part of our brain controls the behaviour.  Think of driving a car – when we first learned we had to pay attention to every single thing we had to do – braking, accelerating, signaling etc.  After a few months we could do most of that without actually thinking about it.  Much of driving had become habitual.  The same thing happens when we use substances.  If we use a substance enough times our brain develops a habit for using, or for using to feel a certain way.   We don’t have to think about how to use, a deeper part of the brain makes it happen.   If we use certain substances long enough, the brain actually goes through physical changes, so that the substance use is regarded as essential to feel a certain way.  As a person progresses from social use to habitual use to addicted use, the amount of choice and control that the person has over using decreases.  When a person has developed an addiction, there is a part of their brain that will control their behaviour and compel them use the substance even when they know it is harming them or that it could kill them. 

The good news is that the brain is remarkably able to rewire itself.  New habits can be learned to replace old harmful habits.  But just as it takes time to develop a habit or an addiction, so too does it take to develop new ways of behaving.  The reality of addiction is that there is no simple way to change a brain.  Even when people want to stop using recovery is a long-term process, often with many setbacks, that requires a lot of effort.  Factor in that many people are ambivalent about changing or stopping their use, and the process becomes even more difficult.  Difficult doesn’t mean impossible, but it does mean that there is no simple ‘cure’, no ‘treatment’ that can be imposed on someone that will make their brain automatically change. 

As a culture we have come to believe that there should be quick fixes.  We don’t like to be uncomfortable or to suffer.  We have a society built around instant gratification.  This expectation is part of what fuels people getting in to trouble with substances, and then it becomes part of what fuels people having unrealistic expectations about recovery.  Does this mean there is no hope?  Absolutely not.  Every day at East Kootenay Addiction Services we see people who are learning to reorganize their lives, develop new skills and move away from addiction towards happy and fulfilling lives.  And what makes those people successful?  They have come to recognize that there isn’t a quick fix.  Life requires ongoing effort and focus, whether that is recovering from an addiction, having a family, or building a career.  Accepting that recovery is a process and not a cure has allowed those people to work realistically and productively towards better lives.

This is the third article in a series regarding changes to marijuana legislation in Canada. The series is written by East Kootenay Addiction Services Executive Director, Dean Nicholson. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services. 

Here is the title of a research article published in the January edition of the journal Cerebral Cortex by researchers at Western University:  Adolescent Cannabinoid Exposure Induces a Persistent Sub-Cortical Hyper-Dopaminergic State and Associated Molecular Adaptations in the Prefrontal Cortex. 

Now, if you’re like me and never read the journal, Cerebral Cortex, this title probably sounds like a strange foreign language.  In fact, I’m showing this as an example of the kind of research that it is trying to determine the potential positive and negative effects of marijuana use on teen brains.  As the Canadian government moves towards legalizing marijuana one of the big concerns is going to be the potential impact on adolescents.  Both the previous Conservative government and the current Liberal government said they wanted to limit teens’ access to marijuana and protect them from marijuana’s risks.  The two governments had very different ideas about how this could be done, but that’s the topic for a different discussion.  

What is important to realize is that quality research on the risks and/or benefits of marijuana use is relatively scarce, and the research that is being done that helps to shed some light on how marijuana may affect teens tends to be published in obscure specialist journals with intimidating titles like the one above.  Most people don’t access this kind of information.  What people might find when they look for information is sites on the Web, YouTube or Blogs.  Some of these sites may be very good and based in good research, while many are little more than personal opinion sites masquerading as expert testimony.  For the average person it can be very difficult to sort through. 

At East Kootenay Addiction Services we routinely hear teens talking about a website they found which says marijuana is perfectly safe, while concerned parents talk about a site they found which says marijuana is the worst drug ever used.  ‘Seek and ye shall find’ could be the catch phrase for the Web, as you are bound to find a site that will affirm your beliefs.  So how to sort through all of this?  On our EKASS website we provide links to Canadian and International websites that we believe provide the best balanced information on substances and substance use.  Check these sites out as a good starting place for more accurate information. 

As for the study I mentioned above –it found that giving heavy doses of marijuana to young rats created lasting behaviour and brain changes which resembled those found in people with schizophrenia.  They did not find these changes in adult rats exposed to marijuana.  The implication being that heavy marijuana use in teens may cause more significant damage than in adults (at least if you’re a rat). 

In the next article I’ll talk more about some of the research findings of the potential impact on teens of marijuana use.  Stay tuned.

Dean Nicholson, Executive Director

East Kootenay Addiction Services Society

January 26, 2016

This is the third article in a series on Mindfulness. This article was written by Barry Boyce and reposted by East Kootenay Addiction Services. To read more about Mindfulness and how it relates to Substance Use visit our page about Mindfulness in the Resources/Adult section of our website. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services. 

By Barry Boyce | March 1, 2016

For what matters most… Live in the now… Make the most of the moments that matter.

I received a steady diet of these inspiring messages in movie theater ads preceding the coming attractions during Christmas. They were being used to sell…Tylenol.

Words are indeed cheap, and many of the words used to promote mindfulness are the same words used to sell lots of stuff these days. For good reason: We crave these things. As cheesy as it sounds, we do want “moments that matter” and we do want to “live in the now.”

But it’s also false advertising. There is no supercool place called “the now,” where everything is ever bright and beautiful. It doesn’t work that way. Being present is an ordinary thing. It doesn’t come with brass bands and balloons, unless the present moment happens to be celebrating a grand opening.

The present moment comes just as likely with pain or confusion or uncertainty. What’s true, and profound, about the moment we’re in, is that it’s the only possible place we can operate from. It’s the address our body is located in. It’s the perch from which we launch forward to what’s next. And it’s not fixed. It’s always emerging.

When the conception of mindfulness as something all gooey—talked about in hushed tones with flute music playing—takes hold, it often has little appeal to people in pain who are dealing with dark challenging emotions: fear, anger, sadness, jealousy, dread, regret, you name it.

The notion of mindfulness practice as something that would enable them to stay with and explore those tough emotions—all the better to understand them and loosen their grip— slips past them. If a facile cheeriness is all that’s on offer, it makes about as much impression as a Tylenol commercial.

As mindfulness programs have taken hold over the past few decades, it has been interesting to see what keeps people coming back. They often sign on in the first place because they have an uneasy feeling that they could perform better, and that is an entirely valid reason to sign on. Meditation does help you perform better.

But what keeps them coming back, many trainers say, is the insight they gain into what’s going on in their brains and bodies, including trauma. They gain more focus, yes, but the real payoff comes from finding a means to deal with the really tough stuff. And that’s why they say things like, “I’ve become a better human being since starting mindfulness practice,” and that’s where the real change in performance comes from.

Really living in the now brings not just relief and peace. It also brings courage, strength, and the willingness to be with ourselves, and others, through thick and thin. Let’s hope mindfulness becomes famous for that, rather than being a Happy Meal for the Mind. If it doesn’t, lots of people who could benefit may never find their way to meditation. They’ll take Tylenol instead.

This is the second article in a series regarding changes to marijuana legislation in Canada. The series is written by East Kootenay Addiction Services Executive Director, Dean Nicholson. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services. 

This is the first article in a series regarding changes to marijuana legislation in Canada. The series is written by East Kootenay Addiction Services Executive Director, Dean Nicholson. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services. 

This article is written by Theresa Bartraw. Theresa is the Regional Youth Substance Use Education Coordinator at East Kootenay Addiction Services. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services.

This is the third article in a series on Mindfulness written by Maureen Smith. Maureen is a Substance Use Counsellor at East Kootenay Addiction Services who has an interest in Mindfulness and finding creative ways to incorporate it into her counselling practice. To read more about Mindfulness and how it relates to Substance Use visit our page about Mindfulness in the Resources/Adult section of our website. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services.

This is the second article in a series on Mindfulness written by Maureen Smith. Maureen is a Substance Use Counsellor at East Kootenay Addiction Services who has an interest in Mindfulness and finding creative ways to incorporate it into her counselling practice. To read more about Mindfulness and how it relates to Substance Use visit our page about Mindfulness in the Resources/Adult section of our website. The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services. 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3 Steps to Slay the Procrastination Dragon

This is the first article in a series on Mindfulness written by Maureen Smith. Maureen is a Substance Use Counsellor at East Kootenay Addiction Services who has an interest in Mindfulness and finding creative ways to incorporate it into her counselling practice.  The article below does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of East Kootenay Addiction Services.  To read more about Mindfulness and how it relates to Substance Use click here to visit our page about Mindfulness in the Resources/Adult section of our website.  

5 Reasons to be Mindful of your Body

We live in a world that promotes thinking as a superior function.  Many education systems value abstract learning above others. Most people are trained when they’re young to identify with their thoughts. To be mindful sounds like it is an activity that only happens in the head. When we make efforts to train ourselves to pay attention to sensations in the body, we can stop living just in our heads and live more fully in our whole being. Being aware of the body is an important part of living well and mindfulness practice.


1. The human body is an astonishingly wonderful composite!  We often take what it does for granted.  We tend to notice our body when it hurts or isn’t working well.  At these times we may get frustrated, angry and impatient. Most often the body works without us having to notice it.  Noticing the body is a wonderful way of practicing appreciation for the incredible gift that is the body. Every breath, every heart beat is an amazing miracle. And this is true even when we feel sick or sore. Being aware of the body moment by moment helps us remember the amazing feat that we call our body. 


2. Being in our bodies more fully allows us to experience the joy of living.  When we stay stuck in conceptual thoughts the vividness of being in a body and experiencing the senses can be dulled and feel distant.  When we practice mindfulness we are practicing being open to the full experience of being alive. That includes joy and sorrow.  We can’t have one without the other.  To fully taste the cool sweetness of a drop of dew licked from a blade of grass, to fully immerse ourselves in the experience of a dragonfly in sunlight, to feel as if for the first time a rain drop falling from the sky and landing on our skin.  These are just a few examples of the amazing experiences possible if we are fully in the body in the moment.


3. The body is always in the present “now” moment.  When we feel the wind blow across our skin we are experiencing that sensation in the present moment.  Bringing our attention to the sensations in the body means we are placing our attention in the here and now.  The body is not in tomorrow.  The body is not in yesterday.  In this way the sensations of the body and the activities of the body can be useful anchors to bring us to now.   Being in the now brings us out of thoughts of the future and past. Out of thoughts such as “what if…” and “I wish…”  The body remains firmly in the present and is an excellent touch stone for bringing our minds to the present as well.


4. Paying attention to the body allow us to feel grounded.  The body has a mass and is firmly established on the earth thanks to gravity.  Our minds are less solid and can be more like the wind, blowing here and then there:  Sometimes gently and at other times like squalls.  As we practice paying attention to the body in the moment we become more aware of the weight of the body on the earth.   This paying attention to the body can stabilize the windy tendency of the mind to zoom off in uncontrolled ways that can feel distracting and agitating.  Being mindful of the body we are helping our energy ground and be directed.


5. We live in the physical body, lets get to know it better.  Lots of times we try not to live in our bodies.  We do this by ignoring how it feels or wishing it was different than it is. The body experiences itself and life by feeling physical sensations.  The more we are familiar with these the better we will cope with them as they arise.  The body is our home whether we like it or not.  When we open ourselves to the reality of the experience of our body as it is now, not how we would like it to be, we have a better chance of accepting what is happening with more joy and ease.  Being in the body in the moment, moment by moment invokes a state of calm that doesn’t depend on things being pleasant.


Adapted from
http://%20%20http//www.mindful.org/meditation/mindfulness-getting-started/

In March 2015 East Kootenay Addiction Services Society (EKASS) conducted the seventh Adolescent Drug Use Survey. The region-wide survey, first undertaken by the Agency in 2002, includes all students in Grades 7 – 12 in the East Kootenay. The survey is conducted every two years to monitor changes in drug use patterns, attitudes and behaviours amongst East Kootenay adolescents.

Below you'll find the media release from the McCreary Centre Society announcing the release of their first full length report about the sexual health of youth in BC

The McCreary Centre Society has released its first full length report about the sexual health of youth in BC. Using data from the 2013 BC Adolescent Health Survey (BC AHS), the report shows that the majority of Grade 7–12 students in BC are not sexually active, and youth who do have sex are waiting longer to do so than their peers who took the survey five and 10 years earlier. 

Youth who were more connected to family and school were less likely to have engaged in sexual activity. Having a supportive adult inside the family and feeling good about themselves and their abilities were also associated with a lower likelihood of youth engaging in sexual activity. 

In 2013, almost 30,000 students in Grades 7–12 took the survey and those who indicated ever having sex answered some additional questions about their sexual health behaviours. The report found that in 2013 over two thirds of youth (69%) who ever had sex reported using a condom or other barrier the last time they had intercourse. However, only 17% of those who ever had oral sex used such a barrier, suggesting they may require more education about STIs. 

While the report noted many youth were making safer choices around their sexual health, it also highlighted areas of concern. For instance, youth who did not use any form of contraception the last time they had intercourse were more than five times as likely as those who used some contraceptive method to report a history of pregnancy. In addition, social inequities such as an unstable home life, a history of government care, poverty, a history of abuse, and violence exposure were associated with poorer sexual health.

Similarly, some marginalized groups such as lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth, those with a health condition or disability, and youth with custody experience, also reported higher sexual health risks than their peers. The importance of feeling connected to school and family was evident again among students who had sex, in terms of making healthier choices. Also, students who were connected to their community; had supportive adult and peer networks; and were involved in meaningful extracurricular activities also reported healthier sexual choices.

The report can be downloaded from their site: 

Sexual Health of Youth in BC Report

This month marked a policy change in BC which permits select grocery stores to sell alcohol. This post originally appeared on the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health blog, however, while this blog is from Ontario, many of the points are now relevant to BC.

Para-MethoxyAmphetamine

An ecstasy user would like their pills to contain just one active ingredient - MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine). But because banned drugs are unregulated, they can contain other drugs, and sometimes no MDMA at all. Currently, ecstasy  is at times, reportedly containing the drug PMA instead of, or as well as MDMA. Several deaths linked to PMA have occurred recently. PMA brings on effects at lower doses and much less ‘forgiving’ drug than MDMA. Technically speaking it has a steeper dose-response curve, so the amount that could send your temperature, heart-rate and blood pressure soaring dangerously is not much more than the amount you need to feel it at all. People have reported very unpleasant or dangerous reactions after just a single pill or even less.

Have a look at this harm reduction poster for more information about the differences between MDMA and PMA and how to reduce your harms. 

We shared this article on social media a few weeks back and thought we'd share it here too...

Ecstacy in 2015 article

March 16 - 22nd is Brain Awareness Week, a global campaign to increase public awareness of the progress and benefits of brain research. In recognition of the week, EKASS has created a list of resources which highlight the ways in which brain research has added to our understanding of addiction, its prevention and treatment.